[OFBiz] Dev - Tigra Calendar Popup

David E. Jones jonesde at ofbiz.org
Tue Apr 5 09:13:25 EDT 2005


Al,

It shouldn't be too hard to add another .js file. Just search for 
"calendar1.js" in all of the code and you'll get a quick overview of 
where references to another js file might need to be added.

-David


On Apr 5, 2005, at 4:54 AM, Al Byers wrote:

> I am the culprit who put that stuff in calendar1.js. I was worried 
> about lots of things breaking when there was a new js file to be 
> included. Of course, that is going to happen anyway. I will take a 
> look and see if there are more than one file required for the "other" 
> stuff and I will look for ways minimize the breakage, though I am 
> thinking the effect will be significant.
>
> -Al
>
> David E. Jones wrote:
>
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Sure, it is always nice to have updated and improved tools in the 
>> project. If it works out for you I'm sure everyone else using OFBiz 
>> would appreciate it.
>>
>> Yes, I think there were some other methods added to that JS file, and 
>> they should not have been added there. Not only does it poorly 
>> organize them, but putting irrelevant things into a library pulled 
>> from another open source project just makes more work for us in the 
>> future... If there was a reason for it, it probably wasn't a good 
>> reason, probably more of an in the moment perceived convenience 
>> reason... Separating those out and as much as possible sticking to an 
>> minimally changed updated js file would be great.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:53 PM, Chris Chesney wrote:
>>
>>> Using the form widget and the date-time field, we're specifying 
>>> type="date".  This appears to shorten the form input box, but the 
>>> call to the calendar popup still returns a date with a time of 
>>> 00:00:00.0000 appended to the end.  This in turn gets stored in the 
>>> database as a string, which is a problem.  Looking at the more 
>>> recent versions of the Tigra Calendar, it appears to work correctly 
>>> on their site and I've had some success with a quick and dirty 
>>> upgrade locally.
>>>  Are there any issues incorporating the latest version into OFBiz?  
>>> I can take a stab at upgrading it, but it will probably take me a 
>>> while.  Also, it looks like there was a fair amount of incorporation 
>>> of other javascript code into calendar1.js.  Any reason for this?  
>>> Do we want to try and separate this out?
>>>  -Chris
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dev mailing list
>>> Dev at lists.ofbiz.org
>>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at lists.ofbiz.org
>> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Al Byers
> Automation Groups Inc
> 801.400.5111
> http://www.automationgroups.com
> byersa at automationgroups.com
>
> We're "Open for Business" (http://www.ofbiz.org) - the leader in 
> Java-based Web services development tools
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.ofbiz.org
> http://lists.ofbiz.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2363 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.ofbiz.org/pipermail/dev/attachments/20050405/105ab57c/smime.bin


More information about the Dev mailing list